Conocimiento de los niños sobre los estereotipos relacionados con las trayectorias escolares.
How do children think others view their path through school, and why does it matter?
Having been a student in an educational system with early secondary school tracking – in which children were grouped based on their abilities into different schools – Lisa Bardach wondered whether and how tracking might make desigualdades educativas worse. As Lisa tells Annie Brookman-Byrne, that led to her recent research on children’s perceptions of stereotypes about school tracks.
Annie Brookman-Byrne: How did your school experiences influence your research on school tracks?
Lisa Bardach: In Austria, children leave elementary school after four years to attend different secondary school tracks, and these decisions are informed by students’ performance, but also by teachers’ perceptions of their abilities, among other factors. I have always been very interested in the effects of tracking, including how it can exacerbate educational inequalities. For example, there is the potential for bias against students from lower socioeconomic (SES) backgrounds in tracking recommendations, despite teachers’ best intentions to make fair judgements. I also wondered about the influence of students’ perceptions of stereotypes regarding their own school track, which is precisely what my colleagues and I explored in nuestro estudio reciente.
ABB: Can you tell me more about that study?
LB: Separating students into school tracks at an early age can lead to educational inequalities. We chose to study one possible contributing factor among many: stereotypes about school tracks. Might students in lower-ranked tracks become aware of negative stereotypes about their track, with detrimental effects on their confidence and academic success?
“Separating students into school tracks at an early age can lead to educational inequalities.”
To test this idea, we studied nearly 4,000 German secondary school students from three different tracks over four years, when they were in Grades 5 to 8. Students in the lowest track were more aware of negative stereotypes about their own track than were those in higher tracks. Stereotype awareness also increased over time for all students. However, contrary to what we expected, awareness of stereotypes was no more strongly linked to academic outcomes for students in the lowest track than for those in other tracks.
ABB: What are the implications of your findings?
LB: Given the heightened awareness of negative stereotypes among students from lower-track schools, it seems important to challenge those stereotypes – for example by making changes in how adults interact with students and in the media. Such efforts should not focus only on specific tracks, but target any students who believe that negative stereotypes are attached to their track. Ultimately, I hope we can not only change perceptions of different tracks, but also improve the real-life opportunities and experiences of students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
“Given the heightened awareness of negative stereotypes among students from lower-track schools, it seems important to challenge those stereotypes.”
ABB: How do you plan to follow up on this study?
LB: This research has sparked my interest in further exploring social inequalities in education, and in particular examining the role of psychological factors in this process. I was surprised that we did not find support for our assumption that negative stereotypes would be more strongly linked to negative outcomes in the lowest academic track than in other tracks. I plan to continue my research into social inequality in education, while remaining open to the possibility that factors other than negative stereotypes may play a more important role.
Notas a pie de página
De Lisa Bardach La investigación se centra en las diferencias individuales (por ejemplo, motivación, personalidad, autorregulación, habilidades cognitivas) y cómo interactúan y afectan el aprendizaje y el desarrollo. También realiza investigaciones sobre diversidad cultural y desigualdades sociales, además de desarrollar intervenciones basadas en tecnologías digitales para apoyar el desarrollo escolar positivo de niños y adolescentes. Desde abril de 2024, Lisa es catedrática del Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Giessen, Alemania. Lisa obtuvo su doctorado en Psicología en la Universidad de Viena, Austria, en 2018. Tras completar una estancia postdoctoral en la Universidad de York, Reino Unido, de 2019 a 2020, fue profesora adjunta en la Universidad de Tubinga de 2020 a 2024. Lisa es profesora titular del programa 2022-2024. Jacobs Foundation Investigador asociado.
Universidad de Giessen, Psicología Educativa – Diferencias individuales y aprendizaje (digital)
Google Scholar
Lisa Bardach contributed to a special collection on understanding and addressing desigualdad en la educación en la revista npj Science of LearningEsta entrevista forma parte de una serie dedicada a compartir consejos prácticos y reflexiones personales de los autores.
La entrevista ha sido editada para mayor claridad.